Based on the Decree of the Dean of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada (FEB UGM) No. 1226/UN1/FEB/SDM/KP/2022 concerning Grade Conversion and Credit Conversion in the Credit Transfer Process for the International Student Mobility Program at the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada (FEB UGM), the following are the established procedures and regulations for credit transfer.
A. Purpose of the Credit Transfer Process
The credit transfer process determines the equivalence between credit weight and grading weight for courses taken by students in international mobility programs. This is done through an evaluation process that considers credit conversion guidelines, grade conversion guidelines, and course syllabi. The purpose is to ensure that students’ academic achievements obtained during the international mobility program can be formally recognized and recorded in their academic transcript within the FEB UGM environment.
B. Credit and Grade Conversion Regulations
- Grades obtained for each course taken at a partner university will be converted and recognized in the FEB UGM transcript as they are, in accordance with the applicable regulations at FEB UGM.
- Courses taken at partner universities through Dual Degree programs or Student Exchange programs prioritize the fulfillment of compulsory courses required for graduation from the study program within FEB UGM.
- Courses at partner universities that are equivalent to courses offered at FEB UGM cannot be taken if the student has previously completed those courses at FEB UGM.
- Students are required to fulfill the minimum credit requirements to be declared graduates of a study program within FEB UGM.
- Converted credits exceeding the minimum credit requirements for graduation may still be recognized and recorded in the transcript upon the student’s request, subject to approval from the Head of the Study Program, and will be used as the basis for calculating the cumulative grade point average (GPA).
- Students may choose courses to be transferred through the learning agreement submission mechanism.
- The Head of the Study Program within FEB UGM may review the learning agreement submitted by the student before the student participates in the international mobility program.
- The learning agreement for the credit transfer process must be submitted by the student and approved by the Head of the Study Program prior to the commencement of the international mobility program.
- The Head of the Study Program may determine the credit and grade conversion proposed by the student after completion of the international mobility program during the yudisium (academic evaluation meeting).
C. Flow of Learning Agreement (LA) Submission
D. Minimum Credit Requirements for Graduation in Each Study Program within FEB UGM
| Study Program | Minimum Credit | Compulsory Courses | Elective Courses |
| Accounting | 145 (Regular) 144 (IUP) |
127 (Regular) 120 (IUP) |
18 (Regular) 24 (IUP) |
| Economics | 145 (Regular) 144 (IUP) |
112 (Regular) 114 (IUP) |
33 (Regular) 20 (IUP) |
| Management | 144 (Regular & IUP) | 96 (Regular & IUP) | 48 (Regular & IUP) |
E. Credit Conversion Guidelines
Panduan konversi kredit mengacu pada UMAP Credit Transfer System (UCTS) yang dirancang dan digunakan oleh negara-negara anggota UMAP (University Mobility in Asia and the Pacific), di mana Universitas Gadjah Mada merupakan anggotanya. Dengan student workload sebesar 45 jam, berikut konversi berbagai sistem kredit di negara/regional mitra FEB UGM ke dalam Satuan Kredit Semester (SKS). Panduan konversi ini juga mempertimbangkan panduan resmi dari European Commission, khususnya European Education Area, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) United Kingdom, Australian Government Department of Education and Training, serta kebijakan universitas-universitas mitra FEB UGM.
| Negara/Region | Sistem Kredit | SKS* |
| Asia | 1 credit | 1 |
| USA | 1 credit | 1 |
| European (ECTS) | 1 ECTS | 0.67 |
| UK (CATS) | 1 CATS | 0.33 |
| Australia | 1 point | 0.4 |
* : untuk konversi nilai kredit yang berupa desimal maka dilakukan pembulatan keatas dengan ketentuan jika ≥ 0,50 misalnya konversi ke SKS 3,67 maka diakui 4 SKS, namun jika konversi ke SKS 3,45 maka diakui 3 SKS.
F. Sistem Nilai di Negara/Regional Universitas Mitra FEB UGM
1. Australia
| Scale | Grade Structure | FEB UGM | |
| 80-100 | A | H1 | A |
| 75-79 | B | H2A | A- |
| 70-74 | B1 | H2B | B+ |
| 65-69 | B2 | H3 | B |
| 50-64 | C | P | C |
| 0-49 | D | N | Fail |
| Local Grade | Description | FEB UGM |
| 7 | High Distinction | A |
| 6 | Distinction | A- |
| 5 | Credit | B |
| 4 | Pass | C |
| 3,2,1 | Fail | Fail |
2. Austria
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | ||
| Description | FEB UGM | |
| A Sehr Gut (Very Good) | A | |
| B Gut (Good) | B | |
| C Befriedigend (Satisfactory) | C | |
| D Genϋgend (Sufficient) | D | |
| E Nicht Genügend (Insufficient) | Fail | |
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | ||
| Scale | Description | FEB UGM |
| 96-100 | Excellent | A |
| 81-95 | Good | A- |
| 66-80 | Pass | B |
| 51-65 | Low Pass | C |
| 0-50 | Fail | Fail |
| Sistem Penilaian 3 | ||
| Local Grade | ECTS Grade | FEB UGM |
| 1 | A | A |
| 2 | B | A- |
| 3 | C | B+ |
| 4 | D | B |
| 5 | E | C |
| 6 | FX | Fail |
| Sistem Penilaian 4 | ||
| Scale | Description | FEB UGM |
| 1 | Excellent | A |
| 2 | Good | A- |
| 3 | Satisfactory | B |
| 4 | Sufficient | C |
| 5 | Fail | Fail |
3. Belgia
| Numerical Grade | Description | Meaning | FEB UGM |
| 18-20 | Uitmuntend | Excellent | A |
| 16-18 | Zeer goed | Very good | A- |
| 14-16 | Goed | Good | B+ |
| 12-14 | Ruim voldoende | Quite satisfactory | B- |
| 10-12 | Voldoende | Satisfactory | C |
| 1-9 | Onvoldoende | Unsatisfactory | D |
4. Brunei Darussalam
| Scale | Grade | Description | FEB UGM |
| 80-100 | A | First Class Honors | A |
| 70-79 | B | Second Class Honors, Upper Division | B |
| 60-69 | C | Second Class Honors, Lower Division | C |
| 0-59 | D | Third Class Honors | Fail |
5. Canada
| Grade Point Value | Percentage* | Grade | FEB UGM |
| 9 | 90-100 | A+ | A |
| 8 | 85-89 | A | A |
| 7 | 80-84 | A- | A- |
| 6 | 77-79 | B+ | B+ |
| 5 | 73-76 | B | B |
| 4 | 70-72 | B- | B- |
| 3 | 65-69 | C+ | C+ |
| 2 | 60-64 | C | C |
| 1 | 50-59 | D | C |
| 0 | 0-49 | E (Fail) | E |
| 0 | 0-49 | F (Fail) | F |
6. Tiongkok
| Description | Percentage | FEB UGM |
| Excellent | 80-100% | A |
| Good | 70-79% | B |
| Pass | 60-69% | C |
| Fail | 0-59% | F |
7. Denmark
| Danish mark | Equivalent ECTS mark | Explanation of the mark | FEB UGM |
| 12 | A | For an excellent performance | A |
| 10 | B | For a very good performance | B |
| 7 | C | For a good performance | C |
| 4 | D | For a fair performance | D |
| 2 | E | For an adequate performance | E |
| 0 | Fx | For an inadequate performance | F |
| -3 | F | For an unacceptable performance | F |
8. ECTS (European Credit Transfer System)
| Description | Scale | FEB UGM | |
| (Best 100%) | EXCELLENT – Outstanding performance with only minor errors | A | A |
| (Next 25%) | VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors | B | A- |
| (Next 30%) | GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors | C | B+ |
| (Next 25%) | SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings | D | B |
| (Next 10%) | FAIL – some more work is required before the credit can be awarded | E | C |
| FAIL – considerable further work is required | FX | Fail | |
| F | Fail | ||
9. France
| Scale | Description | FEB UGM |
| 16-20 | Excellent | A |
| 14-15.99 | Very Good | A- |
| 12-13.99 | Quite Good | B+ |
| 10.1-11.99 | Satisfactory | B |
| 10 | Sufficient | C |
| <10 | Unsatisfactory | Fail |
10. Georgia
| Grade Point Average | FEB UGM |
| Excellent (4.00) | A |
| Good (3.00) | B |
| Satisfactory (2.00) | C |
| Passing (1.00) | D |
| Failure (0.00) | F |
| Withdrew failing (0.00) | WF |
11. Jerman
| Scale | Description | FEB UGM |
| 1.0-1.5 | Sehr Gut (Very Good) | A |
| 1.6-2.3 | Gut (Good) | A+ |
| 2.4-2.9 | Befriedigend (Quite Good) | B+ |
| 3.0-3.5 | Ausreichend (Satisfactory) | B |
| 3.6-4.0 | Genϋgend (Sufficient) | C |
| ≥4.1 | Nicht Genügend (Insufficient) | Fail |
12. Jepang
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | ||||
| Grade Point | Grade Symbol | Qualitative Description | FEB UGM | |
| 4 | H | Honors | Indicates a performance that clearly exceeds professional standards and the instructor‘s expectations for students | A |
| 3.75 | H- | Honors Minus | Indicates a performance that exceeds professional standards and the instructor‘s expectations for students | A- |
| 3.50 | S+ | Satisfactory Plus | Indicates a performance that clearly meets professional standards and falls in the higher range of the instructor‘s expectations for students | B+ |
| 3.0 | S | Satisfactory | Indicates a performance that meets professional standards and the instructor‘s expectations for students | B |
| 2.50 | S- | Satisfactory Minus | Indicates a performance that almost meets professional standards and the instructor‘s expectations for students | B- |
| 2.00 | L | Low Pass | Indicates a performance that is marginal in relation to professional standards and falls below the instructor‘s expectations for students | C |
| 0.00 | F | Fall | Indicates a performance that is clearly below professional standards and warrants loss of credit for the work | Fail |
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | ||||
| Grade Point | 100 points scale | Grade | FEB UGM | |
| 4 | 90 and above | A: Excellent (Exemplary) | A | |
| 3 | 89-80 | B: Good (Outstanding) | B | |
| 2 | 79-70 | C: Fair (Average) | C | |
| 1 | 69-60 | D: Pass (The above three meet the requirements for academic credit) | D | |
| 0 | 59 and below | F: Fail (fail) | Fail | |
13. Malaysia
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | |||
| Level Classification | FEB UGM | ||
| First Class Honors | A | ||
| Second Class Honors, Upper Division | A- | ||
| Second Class Honors, Lower Division | B | ||
| Third Class Honors or Pass | C | ||
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | |||
| Marks | GPA | Grade | FEB UGM |
| 85-100 | 4 | A+ | A |
| 80-84 | 4 | A | |
| 75-79 | 3.67 | A- | A- |
| 70-74 | 3.33 | B+ | B+ |
| 65-69 | 3 | B | B |
| 60-64 | 2.67 | B- | B- |
| 55-59 | 2.33 | C+ | C+ |
| 50-54 | 2 | C | C |
| 45-49 | 1.67 | C- | C- |
| 44-45 | 1.33 | D+ | D+ |
| 40-44 | 1 | D | D |
14. Meksiko
| Numerical Grade | Corresponding Grade On 4.0 Scale | Letter Grade | FEB UGM |
| 9.5-10 | 4 | A | A |
| 9.0-9.4 | 3,7 | A- | A- |
| 8.7-8.9 | 3,3 | B+ | B+ |
| 8.4-8.6 | 3 | B | B |
| 8.0-8.3 | 2,7 | B- | B- |
| 7.7-7.9 | 2,3 | C+ | C+ |
| 7.4-7.6 | 2 | C | C |
| 7.0-7.3 | 1,7 | C- | C- |
| 6.5-6.9 | 1,3 | D+ | D+ |
| 6.0-6.4 | 1 | D | D |
| 5 and below | 0 | F | F |
15. Selandia Baru (New Zealand)
| Normal mark range | Midpoint | Grade | Indicative Characterisation | FEB UGM |
| 90-100 | 95 | A+ | Outstanding Performance | A |
| 85-89 | 87 | A | Excellent performance | A |
| 80-84 | 82 | A- | Excellent performance in most respects | A- |
| 75-79 | 77 | B+ | Very good performance | B+ |
| 70-74 | 72 | B | Good performance | B |
| 65-69 | 67 | B- | Good performance overall, but some weaknesses | B- |
| 60-64 | 62 | C+ | Satisfactory to good performance | C+ |
| 55-59 | 57 | C | Satisfactory performance | C |
| 50-54 | 52 | C- | Adequate evidence of learning | C- |
| 40-49 | 45 | D | Poor performance overall, some evidence of learning. Fail | D |
| 0-39 | 20 | E | Well below the required standard. Fail | E |
16. Norwegia
| Scale | Description | FEB UGM |
| 1.0-2.0 | Excellent | A |
| 2.1-2.5 | Very Good | A- |
| 2.6-3.0 | Good | B+ |
| 3.1-3.5 | Satisfactory | B |
| 3.6-4.0 | Sufficient | C |
| 4.1-6.0 | Fail | Fail |
17. Filipina
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | |||
| Scale | Description | FEB UGM | |
| 1.0-1.4 | Excellent | A | |
| 1.5-1.9 | Very Good | A- | |
| 2.0-2.9 | Good | B | |
| 3.0-4.9 | Pass | C | |
| ≥5.0 | Fail | Fail | |
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | |||
| Scale | Equivalent | Description | FEB UGM |
| 4.0 | 98-100 | Excellent | A |
| 3.5 | 95-97 | Very Good | A- |
| 3.0 | 92-94 | Good | B |
| 2.5 | 89-91 | Satisfactory | B+ |
| 2.0 | 85-88 | Fair/Pass | C |
18. Portugal
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | ||||
| Scale | FEB UGM | |||
| 17-20 | A | |||
| 15-16 | A- | |||
| 13-14 | B+ | |||
| 11-12 | B | |||
| 10 | C | |||
| ≤9 | Fail | |||
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | ||||
| Portuguese Scale | 1 to 4 (GPA) Grading System | Rating system from 0 to 100 | Classification System from F to A+ | FEB UGM |
| 20 | 3,9-4,0 | 98-100 | A+ | A |
| 19 | 3,7-3,8 | 96-98 | A | A |
| 18 | 3,5-3,6 | 90-95 | A- | A- |
| 17 | 3,2-3,4 | 87-89 | B+ | B+ |
| 16 | 2,9-3,1 | 83-86 | B | B |
| 15 | 2,6-2,9 | 80-82 | B- | B- |
| 14 | 2,3-2,5 | 77-79 | C+ | C+ |
| 13 | 2,0-2,2 | 73-76 | C | C |
| 12 | 1,6-1,9 | 70-72 | C- | C- |
| 11 | 1,2-1,5 | 67-69 | D+ | D+ |
| 10 | 1,0-1,1 | 61-66 | D | D |
19. Singapura
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | ||
| Degree Classification | FEB UGM | |
| A+, A | A | |
| A- | A- | |
| B+ | B+ | |
| B | B | |
| B- | B- | |
| C+ | C+ | |
| C | C | |
| D+, D | Fail | |
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | ||
| Points | Grade | FEB UGM |
| 5 | A+ | A |
| A | ||
| 4.5 | A- | A- |
| 4 | B+ | B+ |
| 3.5 | B | B |
| 3 | B- | B- |
| 2.5 | C+ | C+ |
| 2 | C | C |
| 1.5 | D+ | D+ |
| 1 | D | D |
| 0 | F | Fail |
20. Korea Selatan
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | |||
| Degree Classification | FEB UGM | ||
| A+, A0, A- | A | ||
| B+ | A- | ||
| B | B+ | ||
| B- | B | ||
| C+ | B- | ||
| C | C+ | ||
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | |||
| Point Value | Propotion | Grade | FEB UGM |
| 4.5 | Under 30% | A+ | A |
| 4 | A0 | A | |
| 3.5 | Under 40% | B+ | A- |
| 3 | B0 | B+ | |
| 2.5 | Over 30% | C+ | B- |
| 2 | C0 | C+ | |
| 1.5 | D+ | C- | |
| 1 | D0 | D+ | |
| 0 | – | F | Fail |
21. Sweden
| ECTS Grade | % of Successful students normally achieve a grade | Definition | FEB UGM |
| A | 10 | EXCELLENT: Outstanding performance with only minor errors | A |
| B | 25 | VERY GOOD: above the average standard but with some errors | A- |
| C | 30 | GOOD: generally sound work with a number of notable errors | B+ |
| D | 25 | SATISFACTORY: fair but with significant shortcomings | B |
| E | 10 | SUFFICIENT: performance meets the minimum criteria | C |
| FX | – | FAIL: Some more work is required before the credit can be awarded | Fail |
| F | – | FAIL: considerable further work is required | Fail |
22. Swiss (Switzerland)
| Sistem Penilaian 1 | ||
| Scale | FEB UGM | |
| 5,75-6,00 | A | |
| 5,50-5,74 | A- | |
| 5,25-5,49 | A/B | |
| 5,00-5,24 | B+ | |
| 4,50-4,99 | B | |
| 4,40-4,49 | B- | |
| 4,30-4,39 | B/C | |
| 4,20-4,29 | C+ | |
| 4,00-4,19 | C | |
| 0,00-3,99 | Fail | |
| Sistem Penilaian 2 | ||
| Grade | Qualification | International Grade/FEB UGM |
| 6 | Excellent | A |
| 5.5 | Very good | B |
| 5 | Good | C |
| 4.5 | Decent | D |
| 4 | Satisfactory | E |
| 3 | Failed | Fail |
| 2 | Failed | |
| 1 | Failed | |
23. Taiwan
| Numerical Equivalent | Grade | FEB UGM |
| 4.3 | A+ | A |
| 4.0 | A | A |
| 3.7 | A- | A- |
| 3.3 | B+ | B+ |
| 3.0 | B | B |
| 2.7 | B- | B- |
| 2.3 | C+ | C+ |
| 2.0 | C | C |
| 1.7 | C- | C- |
| W | Withdrawal | F |
| X | Fail | F |
| NC | No Credit | F |
24. Thailand
| Final score (% range) | GPA | Achievement | FEB UGM |
| 90-100 | 4 | Excellent | A |
| 85-89 | 3.5 | Very Good | B+ |
| 80-84 | 3 | Good | B |
| 75-79 | 2.5 | Fairly Good | C+ |
| 70-74 | 2 | Fair | C |
| 65-69 | 1.5 | Poor | D+ |
| 60-64 | 1 | Very Poor | D |
| Less than 60 | 0 | Fail | Fail |
25. Belanda
| Scale | FEB UGM |
| 8.00-10.00 | A |
| 7.76-7.99 | A- |
| 7.26-7.75 | B+ |
| 7.00-7.25 | B |
| 6.76-6.99 | B- |
| 6.26-6.75 | C+ |
| 5.50-6.25 | C |
| ≤5.49 | Fail |
Keterangan:
| Grade | Meaning |
| 10 | Outstanding * |
| 9 | Very good * |
| 8 | Good |
| 7 | More than satisfactory |
| 6 | Satisfactory |
| 5 | Almost satisfactory |
| 4 | Unsatisfactory |
| 3 | Very unsatisfactory * |
| 2 | Poor * |
| 1 | Very Poor * |
| *Grades 1-3 are hardly ever awarded, and 9 and 10 are very rare | |
26. United Kingdom (UK)
| Scale | Grade | FEB UGM |
| 70-100 | A | A |
| 67-69 | B+ | B+ |
| 60-66 | B | B |
| 50-59 | C | C |
| 40-49 | D | Fail |
| 0-39 | E | Fail |
Keterangan:
| Percentage | United Kingdom |
| (70% and above) | First-Class Honors (First of 1st) |
| (60-70%) | Upper Second-Class Honors (2:1, 2.i) |
| (50-60%) | Lower Second-Class Honors (2:2, 2.ii) |
| (40-50%) | Third-Class Honors (Third or 3rd) |
27. Amerika Serikat (United States)
| Number Grade | Letter Grade | FEB UGM |
| 4.0 | A+ | A |
| 4.0 | A | A |
| 3.7 | A- | A- |
| 3.3 | B+ | B+ |
| 3.0 | B | B |
| 2.7 | B- | B- |
| 2.3 | C+ | C+ |
| 2.0 | C | C |
| 1.7 | C- | C- |
| 1.3 | D+ | D+ |
| 1.0 | D | D |
| 0.7 | D- | D- |
| 0.0 | F | F |
